Announcing the results of the Future of Data Challenge: Meet the Winners!
Scoring

Scoring Rubric

Learn more about the four criteria used for scoring during Peer-to-Peer Review and by the Evaluation Panel.

TRANSFORMATIVE (0-5)

Is the solution bold with a clear vision to reimagine the data economy and shift the value of data to benefit all? Is it positioned to scale and serve as a model to build alternate data realities and long-term impact?
2.5
Points
Promising vision with a clear plan to reimagine the data economy. Complements existing and future efforts and has potential to serve as a model for other similar communities.
0
1
2
3
4
5
MINIMAL
GAME-CHANGING

EQUITABLE (0-5)

Will the solution build a safer data future that supports fairness, equity and opportunities for all? Is the strategy inclusive and responsive to populations historically affected by data-driven discrimination?
2.5
Points
Solution is designed to build a safer and more fair data economy. Strategy includes clear plans to include, engage with and integrate feedback from disadvantaged communities.
0
1
2
3
4
5
UNBALANCED
INCLUSIVE

FEASIBLE (0-5)

Is there a practical plan to mitigate risk, tackle regulatory hurdles, and demonstrate impact within a two-year timeframe? Does the team have the track record, capacity, and expertise to deliver results?
2.5
Points
Practical plan and approach reflect understanding of local conditions and barriers to success. Offers a qualified team with relevant partners to deliver results within two years.
0
1
2
3
4
5
IMPRACTICAL
ACHIEVABLE

INNOVATIVE (0-5)

Does the team offer fresh ideas, partnerships, and/or tactics that are inspiring and community-informed? Will the solution change mindsets and build alternate data realities in a new and meaningful way?
2.5
Points
Promising, collaborative solution grounded in convincing community engagement tactics. Some evidence the solution will change mindsets around data in targeted communities.
0
1
2
3
4
5
CONVENTIONAL
INVENTIVE

Scoring rubric